1)...
Genuine No Agenda Sharing frs r always welcum in SBF...good, bad or otherwise it does not matter....this has been my consistent position all along in SBF...
Fact : I hv disclosed
all current frs on this Ling Ling, good, bad or otherwise...in fact i am also going to add on the latest comment on Ling Ling by another samster in my next post...
Query: Once again who r these "
bona fide samsters" n who decides who r "
bona fide samsters" as raised by Max_Priest?...also why does Max_Priest need to raise the issue of "
bona fide samsters" in the first place?
2)...Max_Priest confuses fact wif opinion on this one...it is clearly only his opinion n not a fact...moreover, since when must a samster's nick be mentioned as a prerequisite for making a post in SBF?...Max_Priest now appears to be creating his own set of rules for SBF?!...this is a Public Forum n last i checked only Sammyboy calls the shots...furthermore, it is noteworthy that Max_Priest has resorted to bold highlights, which appears to indicate that it is actually he who is
defensive, uptight and feeling guilty conscience(sic)!...
3)...Max_Priest is misconceived on this one...
pot calling the kettle black relates to his general behaviour n attitude taken in this thread where he tries(but miserably fails) to put me in a negative light whereas he himself has performed in such a negative manner...see my abv posts for more details...
Fact: I repeat what i said in 1) abv...
4)...Max_Priest confuses fact wif opinion on this one...it is clearly only his opinion n not a fact...since when is creating a thread for a GL House(in this case 1807) that does not hv a previous thread created, necessarily a
promotion agenda?...same applies to frs for GL mms per se...i stand corrected but i thought SBF was a place to share info/frs and not a place for
promotion agendas?...
I also note wif amusement that my consistent position re
Genuine No Agenda Sharing has to quote Max_Priest's apparent good buddy"
tingled[" Max_Priest's nerve!!...
Fact:...Max_Priest
repeatedly n aggressively promotes his apparent fav GL mms in SBF...i stand corrected but I dont think there is any other samster who conducts himself in such a shameless n disingenuous manner...
Max_Priest is also being disingenuous when he says "
Honestly I myself also have this intent to help the WLs "!...i wonder is Max_Priest actually "
helping" himself to attain his own
benefits to the detriment of the GL mms instead?...It is perhaps noteworthy that Max_Priest has thus far declined to answer whether the GL mms he writes about, know about his SBF persona n how, when n why they got to know about this in the first place?.....
Fact:...I never set up a
thread specifically to promote Ling Ling[....does a Ling Ling thread purportedly created by me as alleged by Max_Priest exist?...no...this thread that i created is for 1807(there was no previous thread on 1807)...is Ling Ling fm 1807?...yes...so naturally all frs on Ling Ling sld be placed in this thread, right!...ironically i note Max_Priest himself requesting for other/more frs on Ling Ling in this v same thread!!...moreover i did the samething for 2033(creating a thread n compiling all the relevant frs), curiously enuff i did not hear any complaints in tat thread?!...
Fact:...Nato17 stated that
Ling Ling is his kind of gal in response to Nat28's fr on Ling Ling...
http://sbf.today/showpos...postcount=9637...all i did was highlight this apparent rare endorsement by Nato17, tongue in cheek style...
http://sbf.today/showpos...ount=662...now it appears that only a cunning sly person like Max_Priest wif his own sinister
promotion agenda wld translate this, wrongly n falsely i sld add, into i" [/I]tried to capitalize on Nato's unqiue preference for certain type of women to indirectly sell Ling Ling[/I]"?!...
5)...i repeat 1) - 4) abv...
6)...i repeat 4) abv...u r merely just showing to all in SBF what a cunning, sly, sinister person u r Max_Priest, by taking such a position...this is yr personality not mine...
Fact:...Man Man(16W06) does indeed hv fake enhanced boobs...
Fact:...Max_Priest has repeatedly n aggressively promoted Man Man(16W06) in SBF...i stand corrected but i dont think any other samster has done likewise...
Oh n Max_Priest now appears to be totally contradicting himself!...First he says"
unlike Omnia, I embrace criticism and/or comments be it bad or good one. The issues on Man Man's tits (@another thread) and Ling Ling (in this thread) are pertinent examples"...if that is the case, why is it that now you "
cannot accept negative remarks against the WL(Man Man) or query the WL(Man Man) whom you promote and/or promoted"?....
Yes indeed there is definitely
more to this than meets the eye...
Query: Whose eyes?!