TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

[Block22]

Originally Posted by mmm111

Jiak ba buay

Jiak ba pak qiu cheng liao

[mmm111]

Originally Posted by Block22

Jiak ba pak qiu cheng liao

pak qiu cheng liao Ke yi song song Koon liao

[macktamer]

Originally Posted by Block22

Can see your expectation on rating is quite high

If see you rate for 8/10 than probably to me and many others will be about 10/10 perfect liao

Momo is a 8/10, ……. if you switch off the lights lmao.

Originally Posted by massageguy2017

hi bro, how was Alin the last time you visited her?

I more or less agree with bro hakone's comment on her.

Look and body wise, she "was" the heavy-voluptuous type, first pic on her link is the closest to the real thing, the rest u can ignore. But I like this girl.

36C and 50kg "were" real. I will not hesitate to fork out $120 if she include bbbj to the menu.
----------------------

C'mon OKT!! we need more fresh mouth.

[actprunet]

Bro Spawner, i feel your frustration. I've feedback to her.
Whatever excuse she gave is useless given the time you and money you spent. So I'm not going to go into the reason...

She promised not to switch again and you may wish to consider giving her 1 last chance.

Her business was very good yday. I think many folks here trust my FR and I thank folks for that. Now i know why some folks may be reluctant to share sometimes...I'll review my own FR protocol and standard after this.

Nonetheless, I think she is worth a 2nd chance but it is up to folks to decide

Originally Posted by Special Spawner

After seeing your MR, and checking out the pictures and video, really wanted to give this ML a try. How not to with a 95% rating?

But I just realised I was played out by this ML. Messaged her for an afternoon slot and she said she was free. Arrived at her location and was given the instructions to her apartment. I couldn't see the face when I entered as she slightly tilted her head lower. But even that I was super disappointed, because the shape and all is not the 'petite and slim' girl as described. She was short and chubby. Anyway, first thought was probably this MR is dated and she has put on weight. After getting the chance to catch a few glimpse of her face, I was pretty sure there is no similarity.

Now I have to objectively talked about the session with an ML that is not Mei Mei. other than the looks and size, massage was decent. Massage ended quite fast, probably about 20 mins. Sensual wise, also ok. Everything ended in about 30 mins. She didn't chase me away and gave me a hand massage. Times up, paid and left. I thought I have seen this ML somewhere before in the website. came back and check and realised this ML serving me is number 195 Xiao Xin. Same uniform as the picture Mei Mei took. They must be house mate.

Didn't want to talked or describe too much because I am still pissed at being played out by this ML. Unethical!

[Block22]

Originally Posted by macktamer

Momo is a 8/10, ……. if you switch off the lights lmao.

Momo you give 8/10 then to me probably is 10/10 loh , but she no more here , even give a 100 also no use , make me gain want to eat cannot eat only

Now we look for current stock ML ma

[Callaway]

Originally Posted by Block22

Momo you give 8/10 then to me probably is 10/10 loh , but she no more here , even give a 100 also no use , make me gain want to eat cannot eat only

Now we look for current stock ML ma

Here love talking about history and past girls.

I think I must create a thread of historical girls.

Starting from massage joint charging $30 for entry and HJ at $30 era at 10-15years ago.

[Callaway]

Originally Posted by derrickboy

He was probably referring to the MP/SPA I mentioned cos we were talking about it earlier.

https://sbf.today/showp...ostcount=37588

She good? Can share?

[derrickboy]

Originally Posted by Callaway

She good? Can share?

I actually don't visit this particular SPA/MP so often because of the layout and lack of shower facilities and it is not so easy for me to get there. So far I have only been there thrice...

Generally I think that these joints do have rather decent looking girls, or at least those I visited.

[Block22]

Originally Posted by Callaway

Here love talking about history and past girls.

I think I must create a thread of historical girls.

Starting from massage joint charging $30 for entry and HJ at $30 era at 10-15years ago.

Pass is pass liao

Past events only can keep in memorable

We are moving forward not backward

[zeefee71]

Originally Posted by zeefee71

Kena zap liao. Those stupid fools think they can stop me from posting?? Please dream on. Will continue to post though may take few hours to appear but it's okay. I have no sympathy for these scums hiding behind the pc and spending their life on such useless activities. Just another useless and ball-less keyboard warrior.

Repost again

[ShittyAss]

Originally Posted by zeefee71

Repost again

Err why u keep reposting and spamming??

[Callaway]

Originally Posted by derrickboy

I actually don't visit this particular SPA/MP so often because of the layout and lack of shower facilities and it is not so easy for me to get there. So far I have only been there thrice...

Generally I think that these joints do have rather decent looking girls, or at least those I visited.

Can't shower? Ok I passed... thanks

[yalpnez]

Originally Posted by Block22

Momo you give 8/10 then to me probably is 10/10 loh , but she no more here , even give a 100 also no use , make me gain want to eat cannot eat only

Now we look for current stock ML ma

technically. momo is still around till next Tuesday.
her ad on SLG is still up.

I think looks is subjective given that diff bros look at diff features when it comes to looks - hair, eyes, face shape, complexion etc. and we have not even gotten to figure and other factors.

Momo def scores well in most factors.

[derrickboy]

Originally Posted by Callaway

Can't shower? Ok I passed... thanks

Can shower... but the whole place share ONE cubicle

[baotohk]

Originally Posted by ShittyAss

Err why u keep reposting and spamming??

That's his only contribution