TCSS thread "My favourite MASSAGE girls"

[ww888]

Originally Posted by Delorean101

Because some of these girls are overhyped lately due to lack of real quality ML now and they can know it so can slack. In reality their overall service is nothing memorable.

Exactly. Now I'm missing Hebe.

[Blu3]

Originally Posted by Delorean101

Bro I didn't. I don't trust ML for ear digging. Phobia of freak accident and cleanliness of the tool.

Thanks. Last time Zhuli did quite well, pity didn't try too many times.

[Stenzer]

Originally Posted by James67

It's Friday again. No wonder most are fully booked for tonight. Guess I've book earlier that time.

Carrie seems to be free :d

[nemo_ng]

Originally Posted by barrysteakfries

How would u rate her looks vs An Ran and Tina?

The last visit to An Ran was nearly a year ago. Sort of forgotten how she looks like. So I will just do the other 3

looks and syt-ness: QT - Tina - XY
gfe: XY - QT - Tina
sensual: XY/Tina - QT
boobs (size followed by shape): Tina - QT - XY
wanting to return-ness: XY/QT - Tina

/ - means about the same

If you do not mind the slum-tel and the know-what-you-are-here-for glares from the receptionists, QT is really worth a visit.

[James67]

Originally Posted by Stenzer

Carrie seems to be free :d

Carrie relist? Did tell her, will book her once she listed again. Thanks anyway.

[Stenzer]

Originally Posted by James67

Carrie relist? Did tell her, will book her once she listed again. Thanks anyway.

she didnt relist, but "spoke" on wechat

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by nemo_ng

If you do not mind the slum-tel and the know-what-you-are-here-for glares from the receptionists, QT is really worth a visit.

I think a lot of us mind lol..

Send an SOS for her to get a better accommodation!

[SMRTLTD]

Originally Posted by Delorean101

I would say she is above average overall. To me she don't excel extraordinarily in any particular aspects but overall is a very good service provider. Looks don't expect very pretty but pleasant enough. These days people can accept most of the local section milf, she definitely beat most of them in terms of appearance and body. But my last visits to her was before CB. So I can't comment on how she is now. All my past visits to her has been good. As said, it's the same as visiting Aimee and 7 Princess, their standard is always there.

I see.. Interesting.. Have u tried Carol/Nat or Xue Er yet? What's your view on them both?

[barrysteakfries]

Originally Posted by nemo_ng

The last visit to An Ran was nearly a year ago. Sort of forgotten how she looks like. So I will just do the other 3

looks and syt-ness: QT - Tina - XY
gfe: XY - QT - Tina
sensual: XY/Tina - QT
boobs (size followed by shape): Tina - QT - XY
wanting to return-ness: XY/QT - Tina

/ - means about the same

This QT seems like has massive potential. Does she fish like Tina?

[barrysteakfries]

Originally Posted by nemo_ng

If you do not mind the slum-tel and the know-what-you-are-here-for glares from the receptionists, QT is really worth a visit.

Very CB that AV allow them to operate from the slumtel but refuse to open GL. Its all about political correctness nowadays.

[Angellover]

Originally Posted by ww888

Yup, she just sit there texting on her phone. And I never like to tell ML how to do their work, to me if not acceptable to me then just don't RTM.

She made a quick job of you

[nemo_ng]

Originally Posted by barrysteakfries

This QT seems like has massive potential. Does she fish like Tina?

She dun need to fish... I automatically tips her because she is pretty. I'm a weakling.

[Franco_Barsei]

Originally Posted by Angellover

She made a quick job of you

I think she see people one. Can slack jiu slack.

[Michkazuki]

[QUOTE=nemo_ng;20156758]The last visit to An Ran was nearly a year ago. Sort of forgotten how she looks like. So I will just do the other 3

Regretted FFK xiao yu once.. now she didn't reply my message anymore..

[Stenzer]

Originally Posted by Franco_Barsei

I think she see people one. Can slack jiu slack.

yes, i think so too. my experience was better but yes, significant phone use.