Help ! Need Advice...condom slip

[ttok6672]

Hi, recently i bonk a girl... However during action, my dick went soft . After it became hard again, the condom was not as firm as before. Somemore Ky was applied and make condom slippery. I continue bonking and suddenly feel that feeling is different. Not sure if the condom slip off inside her pussy or what... After i cum, i pull out my dick from her pussy and found that it only covers the head of penis (maybe lesser than that), as if like it gonna slip off any moment from my penis head. I hold onto the condom and pull out the rest of condom from her pussy. It is not difficult to remove it from my penis head either. I stare at the condom and found my sperm loaded inside.

Now i am worry that did the condom slip off inside her pussy and when i thrust, the condom fit back into my penis head? And just nice when i pull out, the condom stick back to penis head...worry of being infected...

[juststray]

Go to a qualify doctor ASAP.


If worry about HIV, get PeP within 72 hours (Best within 48 hours).

Get yourself a full checkup after the window period.

Whatever comfort you get here does not reduce any risk of contacting SDT.

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by ttok6672

Hi, recently i bonk a girl...

Who is she? fuck buddy? lover? stranger? sex worker?

If you know her personally take her to get tested. If she's clean then your fears should be allayed.

[ttok6672]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

Who is she? fuck buddy? lover? stranger? sex worker?

If you know her personally take her to get tested. If she's clean then your fears should be allayed.

From dome1...

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by ttok6672

From dome1...

See a doctor asap to receive sound medical advice.

If the condom slipped off it carries the same risk as unprotected sex.

[ttok6672]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

See a doctor asap to receive sound medical advice.

If the condom slipped off it carries the same risk as unprotected sex.

Yes, will visit doctor tomorrow for Pep.

I'm just worried that it slip off inside her pussy and stick back to my penis because when i pull out, the condom is still covering part of my penis head and there is sperm in the condom....

[IAmAwesome]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

If the condom slipped off it carries the same risk as unprotected sex

Would agree with this as well

[asdatasd]

TS, did you go and visit the GP?

[TreeTrunks]

Any updates TS? Did you go for the PEP?

[ttok6672]

Hi All, I did not went for Pep. Dsc doctor tell me not needed.

2 Reason below :

1) Condom still attached half of penis head.
2) He gave me a brochure about Pep and it indicate the estimated risk as:1/2500 which is about 0.04% . Furthermore, condom did not totally slip off during withdraw , multiply by 1/10 for unlicensed. Licensed will be a multiplication of 1/100 . So risk is 0.04% * 0.1 = 0.004%

Conclusion : Not needed. Even without condom, he will not recommend because the percentage is still low. Pep is for Anal or needle sharing which had higher risk than intercourse. With all said, it is still better to use condom. YOLO is not applicable here.

For more info on estimated risk:
http://www.pep.guidelines.org.au/ind...-risk-exposure

https://www.poz.com/article/HIV-risk-25382-5829

[DoctorTan]

Before I get into this, I would first like to say that I think the Dr at DSC gave you very good sound and logical medical advice and he is a really good professional Doctor. I mean this literally. Am not being sarcastic.

Now for my point.

If you look at the PEP guidelines, patients are designated various risk levels based on source risk, transmission risk etc

At each risk level PEP is recommended, not recommended or "based on individual case details"

Now, please note that it says not RECOMMENDED. The guideline does not say not NEEDED.

Basically the Dr is taking the risk upon himself to tell the patient that after weighing up the pros and cons, the cons outweigh the pros and PEP is not recommended.

Lets look at the facts. Yes 0.004% is extremely low risk but it is not zero risk.

If a person holds up a TOTO ticket in front of you and ask you if he will strike 1st prize you would probably say No. But he CAN.

Probability is different from possibility.

So again I say the Dr you saw at DSC was a very good Dr. I just wanted to point out these kind of tough decisions faced by us on a daily basis.

0.004% is 1 in 25,000. In a Dr's lifetime, if he sees 25,000 patients in the same situation and tells all of them they do not need PEP, statistics bear the fact that 1 patient will come back to sue him for giving wrong advice.

[sammyboyfor]

Originally Posted by DoctorTan

So again I say the Dr you saw at DSC was a very good Dr. I just wanted to point out these kind of tough decisions faced by us on a daily basis.

During my student days I dreamed of becoming a doctor in order to do good in the world.

I ended up doing good by running a porn site.

[DoctorTan]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

I ended up doing good by running a porn site.

You, my friend, are the smart one.

[cimhol]

Originally Posted by sammyboyfor

During my student days I dreamed of becoming a doctor in order to do good in the world.

I ended up doing good by running a porn site.

a doctor maybe save 20,000 in his lifetime.

you probably end up doing 2million souls good.

heard of Sun yat sen, dropped being doctor even after practicing years. Ended up saved China

[xxtwentyfour]

Originally Posted by DoctorTan

0.004% is 1 in 25,000. In a Dr's lifetime, if he sees 25,000 patients in the same situation and tells all of them they do not need PEP, statistics bear the fact that 1 patient will come back to sue him for giving wrong advice.

Hi Dr Tan,

I would like to say your post is enlightening, but I would like to add my opinion and request that you correct me if I'm wrong.

The percentage 0.004% refers to a randomly selected member of the general population. A person who visits a clinic specifically to be tested or to seek STI-related advice is hardly a representative member of the general population.

To put it in another way, shouldn't we be considering posterior probability, that is, recognizing the risk to be higher than 0.004%, conditioned on the fact that he habitually engages in high risk activity.