My posts and FRs are now more concise because of my time constraints.
I'm quoting fewer gurus because I can't find any new ideas or revelations. It's the same old, same old. Despite my relentless search. If any bro has found a breakthrough, share it here w/ all of us.
I'm having fewer outings and free tours because I'm now already keeping the best SYTs of my type I hv seen in SG in the last 5 years.
However, my offer for bro Don Juan to show me his 'super chio SYTs' has no expiration date. I now like to extend this offer to all samsters.
Actually, I'm much more discerning and selective now in choosing a SYT. Her youthfulness, cuteness, looks, the right body and limbs proportions of my type are not enough. She must also hv the right character and personality. She should also be hardworking, intelligent and frugal.
One 'new' field for me is Taoist sex which is over 2,000 years old! I'm making good progress, but still a newbie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tartlet
Bro WB
I did tried Taoist sex but wasn't very successful. I managed to pull out but still shot my load before I can try to use my 3 fingers to press the perineum.
Will try again after have more regular sex.
Bro,
It takes time and practice. Start w/ breathing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paynow
Bro WB
The guru post below was gross and at first I couldn't really understand what was written at first read. I read this second time and found out the guru wanted us to understand. On third read, I fully understood the importance.
I do agree that many guys will pass compliments when they saw a stunning beautiful lady. However the beautiful lady will not respond because she expected the compliments. If any guy will to use negging then maybe she will want to find out why?
So passing compliments is needy and not manly.
Plenty of things to learn here and thanks for the nice thread.
Cheers.
Bro,
Thanks for your post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarchi
Same here, I only understand after reading a few times.
Great thread by Bro WB. Hope to learn more.
Have a good week ahead.
Bro, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paynow
Bro
Just have to comment on fantastic write-up here.
I love the way you handled your Bao-ee and I have plenty to learn here.
I also like it when you turn down any gal that do not stick to the terms of agreement whcih is a binding contract. Sometimes gals tend to stretch their authority and how sadly mistaken when they lost.
So here 3 names were mentioned and I read you actually kept 2 as LPs.
Please do continue and guide us.
Cheers.
Bro,
I was a newbie then. Made many mistakes.
The biggest mistake a man can make w/ a woman?
Thinking that she is somehow better or has more 'value' than him. It's the kiss of death for the relationship.
Even King Fucahi was not immune.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hupkee
Bro WB
Below forum was a masterpiece!!
Actual fact we shouldn't take anyone for granted. Any relationship will need to base on trust. I read that bro WB said my words are my integrity and honor. So if anyone dun trust then no point going into any r/s or even friendship.
TC's ex-bf is just going "Psychopathy" and started to be aggressive trying to dictate what TC cannot do. Taking over the phone and deleted all guy contact is wussy. Simple insecure.
No gal ever like such a man and over a period the gal will get very tired of such behavior. To gals, these are unacceptable. Even for guys when our gfs started to get possessive and jealous in public view then time to dump such a gal.
Any strain r/s will be difficult to repair and any argument may turn into huge fight like Ali vs Frazier.
I find such man as kid and haven't grow up. Will stay far away from such man.
IN any long-term r/s is never easy and needs plenty of compromise. If both sides pick on little things then the r/s will never last.
I love the way bro WB pickup mm regularly and so in a way keeping things fresh. Starting a new r/s is easier than trying to stay on strain r/s.
Any comment?
Hope to learn from more seniors and expert gurus.
Cheers.
NB - dun curse me for quoting the long past masterpiece.
Bro, thanks!
Truly successful long term RS between a man and a woman is a tough journey and requires a lot of work and insights. And compromises and commitment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by paynow
Bro WB
Fully agreed with you on the above points. I also hated gals who are narcissistic, Machiavellian, psychopathic gold diggers.
OMG, trf 1 billion USD surely is money laundering similar to 1MDB case.
Thanks bro.
Bro, tks.
Some men say that a subtype of gold diggers is the so-called green tea bitches. These girls are of a higher class. Better educated, more intelligent and more hardworking. It's a derogatory term and maybe unfair to the gals.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tampop
Bro WB
I am no legal experts but I can tell you the following -
1. so long no sex it's perfectly legal to hold her hands in public or your own home.
2. even though gal told you her real age 18 but her passport stated she still 17 then she is deemed 17 yrs old in the eyes of law.
3. when she turns 18 then yes do whatever you wanted and anywhere including hotel rooms.
I love the way the thread flows and well written with full details of case studies. It is difficult to find a good thread which lasted a decade in SBF.
I was also impressed by the varieties of topics discussed and many seniors eagerly provide clear definitive answers with courteous replies.
This is well kept thread with high level of discussions and low in-fighting.
Please keep this spirit of sharing going on for another decade or longer.
Cheers to everyone and good health too.
Bro, thanks.
I didn't touch the 17 yo girl. She wanted to return one year later, but I had lost interest. I could only BY 2-3 girls at any one time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beeheng
Bro WB
Thank you for your thread.
I was reading the thread this morning and came across this old post.
I realized not me but even guru also noticed that sometimes as men we are worrying too much.
Everyday we worried about these and that. Often my friends told me they worried about work, life and etc. I replied that I only worry I have no money.
Ego run amok is bad and together with low-esteem the guy can forget about doing anything in life. Needless to say how this guy can chase women when any guy possess such ego amok and low esteem.
Thank you for a great thread.
Will comment more when reading any interesting post.
Good weekend to all.
Bro, tks for your post.
Worrying is the most useless and destructive habit. A worrier always lives in the future which doesn't even exist.
Quote:
Originally Posted by beeheng
Bro WB,
I always believed what goes down will also go up!!
Excellent detailed posts about the gals that you failed to catch. To me, is ok to fail but we learned from the failures and be successful.
I always cannot believe when others had never failed before.
If we are young and when we fall down we get up try again.
There are many ppl who never get up and try again but gave up.
Cheers again.
Bro, thanks.
These encounters happened a long time ago. I hv greatly improved since.
When a man becomes enamored w/ a gal for whatever reason, he loses his objectivity n rationality n will attach great value to her pussy...and he will end up paying dearly.
If a man realizes that all pussies, including very beautiful ones, are fungible commodities n are expendable, he will never be KC-ed by any of them.
Cheers!
Bro WB
Bro WB
I have so much to learn from this thread.
What you written above in bigger fonts make common sense.
Are u being "MONOPULATED" by ur GF/OC/mistress/er nai /lover/FB or the KTV gal/singer u just want to ST or a GL legal gal/FL w/ whom u desire more GFE, etc?
A guru coins the word MONOPULATION in his recent newsletter.
I'll quote him verbatim.
Feeling compelled to give a woman what she wants without any regard at all as to whether your needs are
being met or not? That's not a relationship, that's "monopulation".
WHAT IS "MONOPULATION"?
A couple of days ago Emily and I were on a live coaching call.
Emily was making a pretty profound point when she busted out
mid-sentence with the word "monopulated".
She quickly paused to correct herself. Right then I asserted, "Hey
wait a minute. Did you mean 'manipulated' or 'monopolized'?
Either word would have worked equally well in that context.
Indeed. As it turned out, Emily needed not correct herself at all.
A new--and deadly accurate, if not exactly scientific--term was born.
So what, then, IS "monopulation"?
Well, picture this...
Boy meets Girl. Boy is instantaneously smitten with Girl, having
(once again) been "clouded by beauty-vision".
Having pre-approved her on sight, basically, it was all he could do
to gather his gonads in a bundle and "ask her out on a date".
Half-heartedly, Girl agrees. After all...she might get a free dinner
out of the deal, if nothing else.
And wouldn't you know it? Once "date night" finally arrives after
a couple sleepless nights the dude spent writhing in anticipation,
Girl flakes out on him.
Errr...I mean, um...he FINALLY gets in front of her. (Yeah, that's it...)
Okay, so go figure...Girl actually finds Boy charming, in a nervous
sort of way.
And best of all (from both of their perspectives, for what it's
worth), Boy pretty much plunked down his entire life savings to
take Girl to some fancy-pants steakhouse that rhymes, ironically
enough, with "Youth's Bliss".
Obviously, Girl senses a solid opportunity to have a "nice friend".
...And one who gives her stuff, no less. All the better.
And hey, Boy seems to be ALL ABOUT giving her whatever she wants of
his own volition. No worries.
So....just as sort of an "insurance policy", Girl is sure to turn on
the "feminine wiles", presenting herself to be just about as sexy
as humanly possible.
And thus the cycle begins and continues for days, weeks or even
months...depending on how long it takes Boy to finally get over the
delusion that he might FINALLY get to kiss her someday.
(What, you were expecting MORE? You've got to be kidding.)
What happened here? Boy got MONOPULATED by Girl, that's what.
Not only did Girl manipulate the boy into giving her exactly what
SHE wanted, they had an "exclusive relationship".
In this case, that means the "relationship" was "exclusively" about
meeting HER needs.
Her needs monopolized everyone's attention. Boy didn't get
ANYTHING he wanted out of the deal, unless you can somehow include
"getting to be seen with a hottie."
(And If that qualifies as a balanced relationship where everyone is
deserving what they want, then I strongly encourage you to call me
for live 1-on-1 coaching RIGHT NOW.)
Need another example, just to be sure?
OK, here goes.
This time, Boy meets Girl as before, but there's a different twist.
Boy thinks Girl is "okay", but since he hasn't been seeing much
"action" lately, he goes ahead and decides to hang out with her
just for the heck of it.
Meanwhile, Girl feels her "biological clock" ticking, and is on a
mission to find a husband with a quickness.
Girl finds Boy to be a "nice" guy. He appears to be good "husband
material".
And to her utter joy, she can't help but discern during their
"first date" that he really isn't finding it so easy to get a
girlfriend, for whatever reason.
Following logically, Girl guesses that Boy must be pretty desperate
for sex.
This really couldn't be more to Girl's delight as it plays directly
into her favor.
Therefore, girl turns up the flirtation and hints just a bit (i.e.
just enough) that she could be sexually interested.
Boy gets hot under the collar.
Girl makes it perfectly clear that she's looking for a "marriage
minded" guy and isn't going to "give it up" until she's in a
committed relationship.
So, of course, guy declares a civil war on himself inside his own
head. The battle rages between the "just have sex with her
already" faction and the "but dude...she's not exactly what you're
looking for, is she?" faction.
But the last thing Boy thinks to do is walk away.
A week later they're going steady. But five weeks later they're
still NOT GOING all the way.
Nevertheless, three months later he stumbles into a jewelry store
that rhymes with "Jails" and buys a diamond ring...on a payment plan.
They have sex.
A week later they go ahead and buy a house together.
Four more months later, the princess wedding of Girl's dreams
happens...because that's how long it took to plan it.
Boy wakes up on the second night of the honeymoon in a cold sweat.
He wonders how this all happened so fast....or AT ALL, for that
matter.
She stops having sex with him, except when absolutely necessary.
Is it because she senses he really doesn't want to be there?
Who knows? But they still have mortgage payments together, and
he's still making payments on the ring.
You got it...monopulation.
With that, there you now have two examples.
Now, to be clear--and to obviate the need for some of the e-mails
some of you are probably already typing--let me drop two quick notes
on you.
1) Monopulation is NOT GENDER SPECIFIC
We as guys can monopulate the heck out of women, if we're
opportunistic Idiot/Jerks (aka I/Js) and they're as weak-willed and
desperate as Boy is above.
But this is a newsletter that's primarily written for men, so all
of you ladies who are reading this anyway are going to have to keep
that in mind for now.
Suffice it to say, however, that any man who dangles "relationship"
in front of a woman who sees him as Prince Charming just so he can
add her to his Booty Call Harem (aka BCH) is a monopulator.
And just as importantly...
2) ...all male/female relationships are NOT lousy with monopulation
Come on, now. You're talking to a married dating coach here.
Of course I believe that men and women can, and should, embark upon
healthy relationships together.
But solid relationships that last are usually built between two
people who are both CHOOSERS, without a CHASER in sight.
It's when you have a CHOOSER who has found a "live one" in the form
of a CHASER that problems potentially arise. There's a severe risk
in that scenario that the chooser may not be able to resist the
urge to monopulate the chaser.
The simple (but not always easy) solution to ending monopulation
forever?
Deserve what you want.
That always involves being the kind of man who the woman you want
is going to want in return. But it ALSO involves being able to
SELECT the right kind of woman instead of the wrong one.
So enough already about how we can completely starcross our
interactions with women by painting ourselves into the monopulation
corner, right?
.....................................
Be Good,
Mr. Guru
Bro WB
Thank you for your post above.
I was reading all the exchanges and discussions before I came to the above posts. Thank you so much for all the brothers who had contributed to the success of this thread.
I have never heard of "monopulation" and today I learned first time.
Agreed that monopulation is not gender bias and apply both sexes.
Good for you that you din not touch the 17 yo. There are always other syt which will excite you.
Agree that worry too much will spoil the fun. No wonder Nike says "Just Do It".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tivoli
True, better don't worry too much.
Very good thread here by bro WB.
Enjoy your weekend.
Bros, thanks for the posts.
Over the years, there have been many 16-17 yo SYTs who want BY. I always tell them I can't do that until they turn 18 yo. I often don't want them when they turn 18 yo, for various reasons.
Only one who changed her mind.
There was a chio n cute 16 yo Hong Kong girl who was introduced to me by an agent for BY in mid 2015. She was born in Jan 1999. I have a copy of her HK IC. 170 natural C, slim w/ good body and limb proportions. She was eager to come to SG to study. I told her to wait until 18 yo. We kept in touch by phone and video chatting. She confided w/ me about her family problems and her frustrations. Her mom wanted her to quit school n go to work. She would call me when she felt depressed and hopeless.
In Jan 2016 she told me she wanted to start school in SG in coming Sep. She was asking me to pay for school tuition, food and lodging. And really very little else. Total damage less than 3k a month. What a great bargain I would say. Of course, I said sure. She started calling me her 恩人. Then she wanted to come in May for a 3-day visit. I said ok at first, then 2 weeks later, I told her better come in Sep. Subsequent to that her attitude radically changed and she was not replying to my msg and not picking up my calls. BTW, We communicated mostly in English.
I asked her what happened. Took her a long time to reply. She wrote: Because you're unreliable. Yup, she was right. I didn't keep my promise. I changed my mind because I was busy then and because I was thinking of saving the expenses of her airfare and 3-day hotel fees. Don't forget that I couldn't do much more than kissing her because she was still only 17. But no excuses. I Behaved like a wuss.
The Chinese say 一诺千金， the Americans say a man's word is his bond.
I learned a very valuable lesson from a 17 yo Hong Kong SYT!
A man's trustworthiness is THE most attractive masculine trait.
I shall never forget that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deancafe
Bro WB
I have so much to learn from this thread.
What you written above in bigger fonts make common sense.
Hope to learn more here.
Cheerios!!
Bro,
Thanks for your post. Sometimes I still forget what I wrote. I must practice what I preach.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deancafe
Bro WB
Thank you for your post above.
I was reading all the exchanges and discussions before I came to the above posts. Thank you so much for all the brothers who had contributed to the success of this thread.
I have never heard of "monopulation" and today I learned first time.
Agreed that monopulation is not gender bias and apply both sexes.
Over the years, there have been many 16-17 yo SYTs who want BY. I always tell them I can't do that until they turn 18 yo. I often don't want them when they turn 18 yo, for various reasons.
Only one who changed her mind.
There was a chio n cute 16 yo Hong Kong girl who was introduced to me by an agent for BY in mid 2015. She was born in Jan 1999. I have a copy of her HK IC. 170 natural C, slim w/ good body and limb proportions. She was eager to come to SG to study. I told her to wait until 18 yo. We kept in touch by phone and video chatting. She confided w/ me about her family problems and her frustrations. Her mom wanted her to quit school n go to work. She would call me when she felt depressed and hopeless.
In Jan 2016 she told me she wanted to start school in SG in coming Sep. She was asking me to pay for school tuition, food and lodging. And really very little else. Total damage less than 3k a month. What a great bargain I would say. Of course, I said sure. She started calling me her 恩人. Then she wanted to come in May for a 3-day visit. I said ok at first, then 2 weeks later, I told her better come in Sep. Subsequent to that her attitude radically changed and she was not replying to my msg and not picking up my calls. BTW, We communicated mostly in English.
I asked her what happened. Took her a long time to reply. She wrote: Because you're unreliable. Yup, she was right. I didn't keep my promise. I changed my mind because I was busy then and because I was thinking of saving the expenses of her airfare and 3-day hotel fees. Don't forget that I couldn't do much more than kissing her because she was still only 17. But no excuses. I Behaved like a wuss.
The Chinese say 一诺千金， the Americans say a man's word is his bond.
I learned a very valuable lesson from a 17 yo Hong Kong SYT!
A man's trustworthiness is THE most attractive masculine trait.
I shall never forget that.
Bro,
Thanks for your post. Sometimes I still forget what I wrote. I must practice what I preach.
Thank you for the detailed SZ + CP trip field report. You made an interesting observation that there was quantity but quality was so-so.
I was surprised you also arranged sssyts to flew over to be with you too.
I think you dun feel good living in PRC because you mentioned previously you like to settle down in Xiamen.
i really agreed with you with this statement -
"IMHO, if a man is perceived to hv high ranking on the Male Dominance Scale n if he maintains excellent self mastery throughout the RS w/ a gal n at the same time gives her regular COS, she will be KC-ed. Period."
Really enjoyed all the discussions going on and the planning how to get gals be it in Singapore or anywhere else in this world.
Happy reading!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by warbird
Just returned from HK, SZ n CP. My trip was part business n part pleasure.
BB flew from Fuzhou to SZ n took the train to be w/ me in HK. Went to SZ to take care of some business n had lunch there w/ a business associate from Gotham City n a Hongkie fren ZW. Took the oppty to invite a 23 yo Hubei gal JK whom I met thru MSN to join us. When I 1st saw her, my heart skipped several beats! She looked stunningly beautiful n sexy, prettier than her pics...n even video calling didn't do her beauty justice. ZW, even though he visits CP every month, was very impressed n sexcited due to her curvaceous figure n classy looks. BTW, JK is a sales rep for a drug company n a non-WL. She used to hv a HK BF who was in his late 40s. She is looking for a BF... I hv invited her to come to SG, despite her age.
CP was actually a slight letdown for me. Due to my heavy schedule, I could only manage a day trip w/ my faithful HK fren ZW n was taken to 3 saunas by an agent.
My overall impression of gals in CP? There is quantity n service is very good, but the quality is so-so only w/ rare gems here n there. Of course KTVs offer many more gals n perhaps more gems. The gal I picked was actually not bad at all, but after the session I saw ZW's gal LL n was quite attracted to her! I paid for ZW's gal plus his rm charges bcos he was so kind to accompany me there. LL is a cute n demure 19 yo SYT from Hubei (another Hubei gal!), who started work only a few days ago. She is 165, abt 48 Kg w/ very nice figure n boobs. Nice small bony frame n legs. I got her HP n QQ n I'm also inviting her to come to SG, hehe.
BTW, I did meet up w/ a SBF bro Woody who was kind enuff to drive BB n me to Victoria's Peak for sightseeing n dinner. The view was stunning n panoramic! BB's pic taken at the Peak was beautiful. He is also on the lookout for SYTs of my type. Ths bro Woody!!
Back to some issues w/ BY-ing n KC-ing.
I like to add that even a very youthful n pretty face, great figure of my type plus very attractive, pink, wet n tight pussy could still be unsatisfactory unless I could give her COS quite easily n she in turn could service me w/o inhibitions....n she must never say no to whatever I want, hahaha.
KC-ing is a very complex subject.
IMHO, if a man is perceived to hv high ranking on the Male Dominance Scale n if he maintains excellent self mastery throughout the RS w/ a gal n at the same time gives her regular COS, she will be KC-ed. Period. It makes no difference if she is a WL/FL or non-WL. Her age, educational level n social-economic status r totally irrelevant. He really doesn't need to say or do anything special or be nice to her. He can even treat her quite badly. She will fall for him bcos she can't help it, hehehe.
The gorgeous FF has returned to Fujian. I had lunch w/ her. I told her how much her monthly allowance will be when she returns here on her 18th birthday. She wanted me to BY her right here n now! It took very good self mastery to say NO to such a chio SYT. I did manage to kiss her in my car, haha. BTW, she did meet a few of my frens. She told me: 他们说你很坏. I know what they hv told her: Bro WB is a hunter-predator of SYTs, he has many GFs n he loves to give them COS, he likes young n pretty gals like u, etc. It actually helps me, I believe, judging from what has happened. She is the one who always initiates ctc w/ me...
TC (now in PRC) is not happy that I wont be back to SG until early May. She wants to accompany me to Gotham City! She is also distressed that real estate prices r still rising in her small town in Fujian. I told her to relax as housing prices should decline by 20-30% within one yr, haha.
My 1st BAO-ee XW n the SH songbird CD also hv returned to SG recently. They hv extended their student visa.
Thank you for the detailed SZ + CP trip field report. You made an interesting observation that there was quantity but quality was so-so.
I was surprised you also arranged sssyts to flew over to be with you too.
I think you dun feel good living in PRC because you mentioned previously you like to settle down in Xiamen.
i really agreed with you with this statement -
"IMHO, if a man is perceived to hv high ranking on the Male Dominance Scale n if he maintains excellent self mastery throughout the RS w/ a gal n at the same time gives her regular COS, she will be KC-ed. Period."
Really enjoyed all the discussions going on and the planning how to get gals be it in Singapore or anywhere else in this world.
I am really interested to read the post below and I hv plenty to learn.
Quite agreed with bro on the young syts. Most syts are not good in bed and will not be able to do much foreplay because they lack of proper training and experiences. Need to be guided by sexperts like bro WB before the syts can be really good in bed.
I like to discuss horoscope and how this affect the r/s.
We are know chinese horoscope have 12 animals and born diff years.
If we count 18yo today then we are talking about syts who are born in 2000 birthday before Aug 2000.
Year 2000 was Dragon year and not suitable for Dogs.
Year 1999 was Rabbit and not suitable for Roosters
Year 1998 was Tiger and not suitable for Monkeys.
Many fortune-tellers will tell you base on your birth year, month, day, hours and if you are suitable to be with which syts. Well at least in my life, I will never get gals that offensive to my horoscope.
All these are predestined in life.
So if you could not get a certain syt then too bad there will always others coming to your life.
Cheers + happy reading!!
Hmm....if now you interested in the singer...then the gurus to discuss and seek strategies on will be BYBJ or LDH....although they are "retired", their experiences in this field are still top notched and spot on...as for handling young charges...I guess this fall under the purview of Bro WB...hahahaha....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonkeep
These discussions seem to echo an earlier part of this v informative thread about SYT/ MILF sex quality (somewhere above) ... seem to recall a certain consensus that MILFs in bed tended to be (statistically speaking, based on the number of bros replying) relatively better. I personally have not been able to bang too many SYTs successfully. For example, I just fired my SYT baoee in SG - not worth the $$$, despite her pretty good looks. Gave her multiple opportunities to demo some solid sex but, sigh, despite even all the effort to arrange an overnight in SG to test out her cohab skills, she just CMI ... I normally can go pretty long w. a sexy babe but this one got me so pissed towards the end of the overnighter even 'ol didi went on strike!! Bloody never happened before ... that really made up my mind.
To get off the disappointment, I spent a wonderful couple of weeks with a bunch of probationary baoees: 2 v interesting Rabbit yr gals - one at 1.68m from DC with wonderful legs n CFM moves, and another 1.6m from CI from Gansu - cute and cuddly. By contrast though, the most spectacular one so far that I have been salivating over (literally) has been a CI MILF fm Chengdu ... though she's actually 1.62 m only, boy she's one well maintained babe. For once (I'm usually an A/B cup fella) I've encountered a C with the tinest nips (almost as alluring as my China baoee), a stupefyingly proportionate bod (which gives her the illusion of height), slim pretty legs, elegant fingers and toes - but what takes the cake are her responses in bed ... wha lou, one hell of a tigress.
Our first roll in bed was mind-blowing: natural frenching, 10/10 GFE, Jap-AV standard noises and orgasms (by her) that were unbelievably frequent and cock-achingly violent. Had to grab her v tightly to control the amount of pelvic thrusting she was giving back (didi even slid out from all the action a few times, prompting me to lock arms round her real tight) ... could not believe the ol didi was rapidly back in form after the 1st shot in record time just looking at her nude, sweat-drenched and glistening bod, and she giving me the kind of cock teasing CFM looks ... no fussy nonsense about male sweat, dimming the lights, shyness, hesitation to kiss etc, etc.
You can imagine the buay tahan state of mind I was in after that first one, so quite willingly padded her wallet to keep her rested for a few days and arranged a couple more sessions: nice chatty meals, music at Boat Quay, smoke breaks at Mt Faber, followed by action at better hotels where we progressed to half hour baths together, soaping each other up and sliding about in the tub n floor, chasing around the room and play-acting (doctor- patient/ slave and master/ pros and customer) before proceeding to long steamy sessions of wild, noisy banging. We were into wild and wet 69 coupling by the 2nd session ... discovered also that the Ft Canning Hotel de luxe rooms have great sextisfying mirrors by the bed - both of us perversely watching our own self-made live AV shows as we banged ... only screw-up, we knocked over a wine glass from all the crazy action and kenna pay damage the next morning for staining. Like what Bro ME said, the older gals seem to have a gd mix of dating quality and banging experience.
Went to LV to hunt for the elusive SYTs yesterday but, sigh ... guess the good ones have all been taken by the masters in this forum as usual ... did an unusual thing for me at LV and got a cute singer in plus a couple of butterflies. May consider developing this cute singer further for some variety ...
... the little head is still persuaded about the relative quality of MILF sex. Of course, I'm still open minded to finding (for me) the elusive solid SYT bang, but based on what the MMS told me yesterday, supplies of SYTs are still tight.
I am interested to learn too. Seems like this is the thread for learning.
Cheerios and have a nice day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by soonwah
I am really interested to read the post below and I hv plenty to learn.
Quite agreed with bro on the young syts. Most syts are not good in bed and will not be able to do much foreplay because they lack of proper training and experiences. Need to be guided by sexperts like bro WB before the syts can be really good in bed.
I like to discuss horoscope and how this affect the r/s.
We are know chinese horoscope have 12 animals and born diff years.
If we count 18yo today then we are talking about syts who are born in 2000 birthday before Aug 2000.
Year 2000 was Dragon year and not suitable for Dogs.
Year 1999 was Rabbit and not suitable for Roosters
Year 1998 was Tiger and not suitable for Monkeys.
Many fortune-tellers will tell you base on your birth year, month, day, hours and if you are suitable to be with which syts. Well at least in my life, I will never get gals that offensive to my horoscope.
All these are predestined in life.
So if you could not get a certain syt then too bad there will always others coming to your life.
Cheers + happy reading!!
Hmm....if now you interested in the singer...then the gurus to discuss and seek strategies on will be BYBJ or LDH....although they are "retired", their experiences in this field are still top notched and spot on...as for handling young charges...I guess this fall under the purview of Bro WB...hahahaha....
I recently received the following from an expert on RS n love:
Why It Pays To Play Hard to Get
According to Bertrand Russell, "Human nature is constructed so that it gives affection most readily to those who seem to demand it the least."
This being the case "and I assure you it is" then what hope can any normal human being who intensely craves love and affection have of winning the one they want?
Won't their very need for the other person be the thing that turns the one they want away from them?
The answer is "NO!" It is not the need for love, which all people inherently feel which drives others away from them, but it is their indiscretion about exhibiting that need. What we need to learn is to make a distinction in our lives between the way we feel and the way we act! Or, in other words, we must learn self-control. Not that we should suppress our emotions to the degree that we deny to ourselves what we are feeling. No, no indeed.
We should always realize and be honest with ourselves what we are feeling inside. But we must be discerning, discreet and wise about the things we know about ourselves, which we share with others. Just because you find yourself desperately wanting someone, for example, doesn't mean you should act desperate. But neither does it mean you should try to deny the feeling in yourself.
So you feel desperate! So what?! There's no shame in that. Join the club. Millions of wonderful, great, fantastic people who have lived long before you have felt this way. There's nothing wrong with wanting.
But what I warn you against is not trying to control the way you talk about it to others. You see, a dog should wag his tail, not have the tail wag the dog. And YOU are the one who ultimately controls your behavior, your emotions should not be doing that.
Remember when you were small and felt unhappy and upset about not getting your way? What did most of us do? We would lie down on the floor and act out our emotions by beating our fists on the floor and kicking wildly. But when we got older we learned to put away childish behaviors and hold back, except in the area of romance.
What I'm saying is that we need to be mature in this area as well. "But," someone cries out, "isn't it dishonest to not express what you feel?" "No," I answer. "It's a simple matter of growing up." The mature thing to do is to learn to distinguish between feelings and actions. Feel intently, deeply and honestly. But keep your behavior in check.
That person who keeps his behavior separate from his feeling ultimately commands the most respect, and love from others.
I must imprint the above advice deep in my primitive brains, hehehe.
Cheers!
Bro WB
Bro WB
What an auspicious day!
Let me quote yous small fine print "I must imprint the above advice deep in my primitive brains, hehehe."
Me too need to have the advice in my small brain.
Really a lovely piece of advice which we knew all along but just the small head took control most times.
28-07-2018, 11:58 AM
t Similar Threads
