Geylang's $50 and $60 Thai Reports (Updated)

[Bowiek]

Originally Posted by notyboy

bowiek's reply continues his trend of repetitive and exaggerated claims, making his review appear more like an agenda-driven smear rather than an objective assessment. here’s a review of his response:

1. repetitive narrative & over-exaggeration: he repeatedly emphasizes "g17 time wasting tactics" and "shower alone 15 minutes" as if it’s the ultimate crime. if this was truly an issue, it would be a common complaint, but he keeps forcefully pushing the same point.

using phrases like "big red flag" and "big landmine" makes it seem like he’s deliberately trying to discourage others rather than providing a fair review.

2. accusations without proof: he insists that "good reviews on g17 are exaggerated by okt kakis," claiming they are posted to lure unsuspecting customers. this is a strong accusation without evidence. just because others had a better experience doesn’t mean they are lying or part of some conspiracy.

mentions of "more people have exposed the g17 scam" lack references or specific details, making it seem like he’s trying to validate his claims by pretending there's a consensus.

3. emotional manipulation & personal bias: words like "victims," "scam," and "slaughterhouse" aim to stir fear rather than provide an honest review.

he paints himself as a "whistleblower" exposing the so-called truth, but his repeated emotional phrasing makes it look like personal frustration rather than factual reporting.

4. lack of balance in review: nowhere in his review does he acknowledge any neutral or positive aspects—just pure negativity. even bad experiences usually have some redeeming factors, but his post is one-sided. this suggests an agenda rather than an unbiased review.

conclusion: bowiek's reply follows the same pattern of exaggeration, emotional manipulation, and pushing a narrative rather than giving a fair review. his claim that g17 is a "scam" sounds more like a personal vendetta rather than a neutral experience. his repetitive focus on the same issues, lack of supporting evidence, and accusations against others suggest an attempt to discredit rather than inform.

Hello you okt runner..when I post honest fr on g17 you don't have to defend her..I booked her one session .I experienced the worst bonk of my life..why you keep defending g17? Get a life ..you are the husband or boyfriend of g17 is it? Go get a life bro

[Bowiek]

Originally Posted by notyboy

bowiek's reply continues his trend of repetitive and exaggerated claims, making his review appear more like an agenda-driven smear rather than an objective assessment. here’s a review of his response:

1. repetitive narrative & over-exaggeration: he repeatedly emphasizes "g17 time wasting tactics" and "shower alone 15 minutes" as if it’s the ultimate crime. if this was truly an issue, it would be a common complaint, but he keeps forcefully pushing the same point.

using phrases like "big red flag" and "big landmine" makes it seem like he’s deliberately trying to discourage others rather than providing a fair review.

2. accusations without proof: he insists that "good reviews on g17 are exaggerated by okt kakis," claiming they are posted to lure unsuspecting customers. this is a strong accusation without evidence. just because others had a better experience doesn’t mean they are lying or part of some conspiracy.

mentions of "more people have exposed the g17 scam" lack references or specific details, making it seem like he’s trying to validate his claims by pretending there's a consensus.

3. emotional manipulation & personal bias: words like "victims," "scam," and "slaughterhouse" aim to stir fear rather than provide an honest review.

he paints himself as a "whistleblower" exposing the so-called truth, but his repeated emotional phrasing makes it look like personal frustration rather than factual reporting.

4. lack of balance in review: nowhere in his review does he acknowledge any neutral or positive aspects—just pure negativity. even bad experiences usually have some redeeming factors, but his post is one-sided. this suggests an agenda rather than an unbiased review.

conclusion: bowiek's reply follows the same pattern of exaggeration, emotional manipulation, and pushing a narrative rather than giving a fair review. his claim that g17 is a "scam" sounds more like a personal vendetta rather than a neutral experience. his repetitive focus on the same issues, lack of supporting evidence, and accusations against others suggest an attempt to discredit rather than inform.

Hello you okt runner..when I post honest fr on g17 you don't have to defend her..I booked her one session .I experienced the worst bonk of my life..why you keep defending g17? Get a life ..you are the husband or boyfriend of g17 is it? Go get a life bro

[notyboy]

bowiek's latest review continues a pattern of exaggerated negativity and questionable objectivity. here are the key issues:

1. overemphasis on shower time - he repeatedly fixates on g17 showering alone, framing it as a "red flag." this could simply be her routine rather than a deliberate "time-wasting tactic."

2. personal vendetta tone - instead of a balanced review, bowiek aggressively labels g17 as the "worst bonk of his life" and immediately attacks anyone who questions him, calling them "okt runner" or "her boyfriend." this defensive stance suggests he might be pushing an agenda rather than just sharing an experience.

3. repetitive accusations - he keeps repeating that g17 demands tips and is a "scam," but lacks substantial new evidence in each post. the consistency of his claims, without variation, makes it look like he's trying to reinforce a narrative rather than providing a fresh perspective.

4. questionable credibility - bowiek states he will inform the okt about g17, implying a desire to get her into trouble rather than just moving on. this further suggests a personal grudge.

conclusion:
bowiek's review appears less like an honest critique and more like a targeted smear campaign against g17. the exaggerated claims, aggressive stance, and repeated focus on minor grievances raise doubts about his credibility. independent verification from other users would be necessary before accepting his review at face value.

[Bowiek]

Lor 8 house 43 g17 big landmine Will inform okt about how bad g17 is..will let the whole house 43 knows about this...g17 is a money faced , ungrateful and cunning wl....just my bad luck...the fact that she demanded 30 dollars tips to allow for kissing already reveals her true colors...a witch ...no need to say more about this evil woman g17

[notyboy]

Originally Posted by Bowiek

Lor 8 house 43 g17 big landmine Will inform okt about how bad g17 is..will let the whole house 43 knows about this...g17 is a money faced , ungrateful and cunning wl....just my bad luck...the fact that she demanded 30 dollars tips to allow for kissing already reveals her true colors...a witch ...no need to say more about this evil woman g17

bowiek's latest review further reinforces the pattern of an overly emotional and targeted smear campaign against g17. key observations:

1. extreme language & personal attack – calling g17 “money-faced, ungrateful, cunning” and even a “witch” shifts this from a review to a personal vendetta. this type of language suggests deep frustration or an ulterior motive rather than an objective critique.

2. repetitive complaints – once again, he fixates on tipping for kissing, acting as if it’s an unexpected demand. yet, many wls in geylang have service tiers, so this isn’t uncommon. his continued outrage over it makes it seem exaggerated.

3. obsession with informing okt – his repeated threats to "inform okt" and "let the whole house 43 know" indicate a mission to damage g17’s reputation rather than simply warn others. if she was truly that bad, a single review would be enough.

4. playing the victim – bowiek frames himself as unlucky, blaming g17 entirely while ignoring that others might have had different experiences. his unwillingness to acknowledge any personal bias weakens his credibility.

conclusion:
this review is more of a personal attack than an honest assessment. the extreme negativity, emotional language, and repeated attempts to rally others against g17 make it highly questionable. independent verification from unbiased sources would be necessary to validate his claims.

[Bowiek]

This white knight keep defending g17 lol...g17 must be your wife...lol..old milf everyday screwed by so many men lol..

[notyboy]

Originally Posted by Bowiek

This white knight keep defending g17 lol...g17 must be your wife...lol..old milf everyday screwed by so many men lol..

bowiek’s latest post is no longer a simple review but a direct and aggressive attack, not only on g17 but also on those who defend her. his language, tone, and choice of words reveal deep emotional involvement and personal resentment, which raises major questions about his credibility and true motives.

1. increasingly aggressive tone: bowiek’s initial reviews started as critiques of g17’s service, but they have progressively escalated into personal attacks. in this comment, he resorts to insults and threats rather than a structured review. phrases like:

"this white knight keep defending g17.. your g17 your wife la?"

"cannot bear to see her screwed by so many men?"

these statements show that he is now more focused on attacking the defenders of g17 rather than simply reviewing her service. he implies that those defending her are overly attached, which is an attempt to belittle them instead of addressing any specific service issues.

2. repeated accusations of fake reviews: bowiek repeatedly claims that people are posting "fake frs to lure customers to her." this follows a pattern in his previous comments, where he insists that positive reviews of g17 must be false. however, he provides no actual proof to support this claim. this is a classic tactic used in smear campaigns—labeling all opposing views as "fake" to discredit them.

by doing so, he tries to position himself as the "truth-teller" while making it seem like everyone else is part of a conspiracy. this pattern is common in people who hold grudges rather than those giving objective reviews.

3. personal vendetta against g17

"i will report u and g17 to av soon.. will ask ica to send her back.."

"rest in peace g17"

this goes beyond a bad experience. instead of just warning others, he is now threatening to report g17 to authorities to have her deported. this is no longer about her service but about trying to destroy her livelihood.

the phrase "rest in peace g17" is especially telling. it suggests that bowiek wants her gone entirely, not just out of his personal experience but out of the industry completely. this level of hostility suggests personal resentment, possibly due to a failed expectation, rejection, or past emotional involvement.

4. contradictory behavior & excessive focus on g17: bowiek claims to have had a bad experience with g17, yet he continues obsessively posting about her. if a customer truly had a bad experience, they would typically warn others once or twice and move on. instead, bowiek has:

a. made multiple posts across different threads about g17.

b. continues to repeat the same accusations without providing new details.

c. engages in arguments with those who defend her, which suggests personal investment.

this makes it clear that his issue with g17 is no longer just about her service, but rather a personal mission to destroy her reputation.

5. psychological analysis – possible motivations: looking at the pattern of his posts, several possible reasons can explain bowiek’s extreme behavior:

a. rejected customer / failed expectation: one possibility is that bowiek expected a certain "extra service" that he did not receive. his repeated focus on money, tips, and service dissatisfaction suggests that he may have wanted more than was provided. when he didn’t get what he expected, he felt cheated and now wants revenge.

b. emotional attachment / possessiveness: his statement "cannot bear to see her screwed by so many men?" suggests a level of emotional involvement. he seems disturbed by the fact that g17 sees multiple clients daily—something that is expected in her line of work. if he developed feelings for her, he may be lashing out due to jealousy.

c. business rivalry or external influence: there is also a possibility that bowiek is part of a competing group trying to tarnish g17’s reputation. his accusations of fake reviews and threats to report her could indicate an agenda to remove her from the industry.

conclusion: bowiek’s latest post is not a genuine review, but rather a highly emotional and personal attack. his extreme hostility, repetitive accusations, and threats against g17 indicate a vendetta rather than an honest critique. his behavior is no longer about warning others but rather about destroying her reputation and livelihood.

if his review were genuine, he would have moved on after stating his opinion. instead, he continues obsessing over g17, which suggests deep personal frustration, jealousy, or an ulterior motive.